Ideological Criticism - Final Project
INTRODUCTION
Everyone
always has a choice; too many don’t recognize that fact. In this artifact these students deserve the
chance to reach their greatest potential, if they choose correctly. However, to select the preeminent path
requires knowledge, which is often derived through formal education.
I believe
the greatest asset for a child is a dedicated parent(s) that has unending
vision and purpose to instill knowledge.
In today’s society, with single parent households, working parents,
language challenges, ethnic diversities, often staggering economic disparity; a
passionate teacher may be the only lifeline for a child’s basic survival or
chance to find knowledge and real purpose in life. The parental, academic, and social hegemony
that governs youth ideology, must work in harmony for a youth today to
succeed.
In the late
1960’s I attended three high schools in California. LA High School, which was over ninety-percent
minority, mostly African American, then Fairfax High School, with an over ninety-nine
percent student body of the Jewish faith, and finally University High School,
which was a conglomerate of all ethnicities California had to offer, as well as
diverse social economic conditions. Some
students arrived by chauffeured driven limousines, some drove Corvettes, while
others were bused in from outlying ghettoes.
My view of the challenges faced by students to achieve an education has
been diverse and extensive. The 1960’s
was also the preamble for rebellion against most forms of organized hegemonic
ideology and the inauguration of social freedom and independence.
In 1984 my
first child was lottery selected to be bused thirty minutes away to Carson
Elementary to start kindergarten. A school
located in a low-income Hispanic community that I would not let my wife drive through
even during daylight hours. Not because of prejudice, but because of
safety and common sense. Whereas a
perfect school I had selected for my child was only one block away from my home,
my son was commanded to be bused to Carson City, California. I fought and lost a battle with the State of
California over this issue. So before school started I uprooted our lives and
moved my family to Utah. I exercised a
choice.
I have observed
throughout life the inequality of ethnic and social injustices, without finding
many solutions. The one elucidation I
have come to know is the only semblance of equality lies in knowledge, but that
simply becomes a catch phrase for education.
Education is not enlightenment.
Enlightenment is when someone “gets it” for themselves. Enlightenment is when they discover a purpose
and drive to reach their own potential to deduce unique choices. That is a time when a parent, or more likely
a teacher, has turned on the light of illumination in the mind of a person
where they can see choices or a future beyond their own existence, often for
the first time.
In this
artifact, a vignette of the movie Dangerous Minds, I propose this teacher, Miss
Johnson, stumbles on a way to illuminate student paradigms, providing a gateway
to overcome their ethnic, geographic and/or social hegemonic conditions.
INTERPRETATION & CONTEXT
Dangerous Minds is a movie based on
the novel My Posse Don’t Do Homework,
by LouAnne Johnson (http://www.louannejohnson.com/bio.htm).
The movie is a rendition of Miss Johnson’s life during her tenure as a
teacher at Carlmont High School, located in northern California in the early 1990’s. Johnson was a former Navy journalist and
Marine Corps Officer who uses her education and experiences to teach high
school subjects to bused-in-minorities, mostly Hispanic and African-American
students. She attempts to open stubborn
minds in this artifact.
Since the
1960’s when bussing students in California became one solution to equalizing education
throughout the state, many successes and failures occurred. There are still questions today as to the
effectiveness of bussing students to other schools. This artifact exposes the audience to a
conversation between a dedicated teacher and, what many would call, typical
students in the challenge of enlightening closed minds.
From a
physical and temporal aspect, since all students are co-mingled together in a
common institution, it should represent equality for all. However, if students are classified by
ethnicity, ability, or some other classification within sub-groups for class
structure, then this equality is lost. Are
students really homogenized just because of physical location or temporal
conditions? If oil and water never mix,
but are within the same container, do they become one? The answer, of course, is no. Therefore, the question that should be asked
is how you can equalize the learning process for all students, if not by equal
opportunity through location.
One answer
is to throw more money at the education system, to create equality. Yet, money does not address the psychological
and cultural differences between the students.
How does an educational system address the students that have been bused
from poverty into temporary prosperity for a few hours and told to learn like
the wealthy kids, then bused back to poverty, gangs, drugs and despair for the
majority of their day? The mental conflicts
would overwhelm the most stable individual.
There are
two elements to this artifact we’ll explore in this rhetorical analysis. First, we will look at the students and their
perceptions of why they are attending this high school. The artifact suggests they are there because
they have no other choice. Many, if not
all, really don’t want to be there nor want to engage in the process of
learning. Observe their non-verbal
communication in class of twirling a pen, sitting on desks or with bowed heads. In fact, the students have a grievance with
the second element to this artifact, the teacher Miss Johnson. They believe she ratted-out one of their own
fellow students, and for that treachery she will receive only disrespect.
Miss
Johnson is there because she wants to make a difference, but can she relate to
students from a totally different ethnic and socially-economic background. If she can overcome this obstacle, she still
must learn how to reach the minds of these students. Miss
Johnson introduces a poem with lyrics that might as well be Greek to this class. Initially, it is not the words of the poem
that creates the learning experience; it is the conflict between these two
cultures. The fact that Miss Johnson is
thought to have ratted one of their fellow classmates, has created a teaching
opportunity for enlightenment. That
event isn’t the issue; it is the circumstances of the students’ ideologies preventing
the learning process. The students vent
and the teacher challenges, “Then leave… There are no victims in this class
room!” Instead of leaving, they are
enlightened.
So what
then is accomplished in this classroom?
Through this rhetorical analysis can we establish what parts of this
artifact were effective and why. If we discover
the impetus of success in this artifact, we might have a tool for other similar
situations.
DESCRIPTION
OF ANALYSIS
This
artifact is well suited for a hegemonic ideological analysis. There are many hegemony forces in play
affecting the students’ ability to independently learn and develop rational
thoughts. There are distinct elements within
this artifact affecting the students’ outcome, the school system, teacher, and foremost
the student with their own hegemony paradigms from parents, gangs, peers and
society. Hegemonic ideoloy defines the
power and advantages enjoyed by one group of people over another group. This usually is a result of social or
economic dominance and or coercion over a less powerful faction, which helps us
to understand why groups function in certain ways.
The concept of hegemony was postulated by the Marxist theoretician Antonio Gramsci in the 20th-century. His theory of cultural hegemony is that one social class can dominate over another diverse group through the manipulation of that group’s values, perceptions and beliefs, whereby that ideology becomes the norm in that society, to the benefit to the ruling class. In this artifact we will primarily focus on the hegemony that affects the students’ ability to learn and think for themselves.
FINDINGS &
ANALYSIS
Hegemony says that one group, by their own self election, has
power to coerce another groups ideology, most often through social controls. This is at the core of the students in Miss Johnson’s
class, and what I believe this artifact is portraying.
These minority
students from birth have been told by one group or another exactly what to do,
and what the consequences are if they don’t.
Parental hegemony is telling
these kids to ignore the street gangs, the drug dealers and pimps. Get an education and get out of this ghetto
condition and make something of their life.
Gang hegemony is telling these kids go ahead and try to escape, but you’ll
be back because this is the only way to survive when society knocks you
down. Societal hegemony tells them they
will do everything possible to make a bridge for them to escape; they will
provide busses to good schools, with great teachers who care, so they can learn
the skills to elevate themselves.
What they
think is reality sets in, when they assume Miss Johnson has ratted out a classmate. Sitting there in self-pity for what life is
really about, the hegemony of their street life foretold what is happening. No matter what they do, getting up early to
catch the bus really doesn’t make any difference, they have no choice. The
ideology established by their surroundings at home, in their real world, always
takes precedent.
Without the
challenge by Miss Johnson “Well, if
you all feel that strongly about it, leave the room,” some might not have
gotten on the bus the next day. Thus,
making a choice they didn’t know they could, yet not understanding that choice
is always an option.
Hegemonic control is so strong it causes people to ignore
the choices that are readily in front of them.
This peer-pressure dictates our actions to the point where we stop
thinking and analyzing our options.
What is fundamental in this artifact is that Miss Johnson
also represents the hegemony group known as educators. It is in her interest, and her group’s
interest, to coerce these same students to her agenda of opening the doors of enlightenment. She wants these students to break away from
the street gangs hegemonic bonds tying these kids to future poverty and less
productive lives. She opens their eyes
when she states, “What
do they choose to do?” Miss Johnson
explains simply they have a choice to get on the bus, come to school and learn
or stay home and sell drugs and kill people, but it is a choice.
The moment
I found most profound is when one student asks, “Read it again.” That student had just made a decision to really
try and understand a different perspective from an opposing faction to his
normal core. In that instant while analyzing
that phrase from a poem, the synapses took place where neurons fired in his
brain for the first time that opened new roadways of never before conjured
thoughts. That was the initial spark, in
this class, for further enlightenment. A switch had been turned-on in darkness, thus
light could flow to see new paths for these students. This
group had broken hegemonic chains, and was on a path to illumination.
They could choose for themselves, “When I go to my grave… My head will be high.” As one student surmise, by making your own choices, “You’re gonna die with pride.”
I wonder if
in this class is a future President like Barrack Obama, someone who has been
enlightened to his own potential, an individual that has escaped the hegemonic
dominance of oppressive groups that might someday rise to the highest stature
in this land. If a single spark can
start a forest fire, can a single neuron ignite a brilliant mind?
INSIGHTS
America is deteriorating in its responsibility to adequately
educate our young people and preparing them for the future. There is significant evidence that families
in the worst economic conditions, along with many minorities, often face the
worst challenges when it comes to securing an acceptable education. Sadly, this isn’t a money issue. As a nation we have substantially increased
funds to education, yet the rewards for that investment fail to show significant
results.
I believe this artifact demonstrates for education to succeed, the student must have a dynamic reason to learn. Someone has to turn on their lights. This someone is a teacher. It takes a passionate effective educator with intuitive perception to break barriers in these difficult teaching situations. The wisdom offered by this analysis is that, illumination of a student’s mind is not about money, location, administration, facilities, or programs; it is about connecting and effective communication that stimulates student thought. Granted, these other issues have purpose and necessity, but the true value of an education is solely in the hands of the student and the teacher. Without focus by either, enlightenment will never occur. That puts a great burden upon the shoulders of every teacher, for they must supply the spark to ignite students.
Miss Johnson stated she does not teach for the money. Therefore, the question for society is to find out what ignites a teacher and motivates them to achieve this kind of success in the classroom. This artifact has shown how motivation and enlightenment works for students even under adverse conditions. One nugget of wisdom left to discover in the future is what will motivate teachers not to give up that inner spark that brought them to this career. What makes some teachers rise to this level of accomplishment? Can we as a society look beyond the traditional solutions for education of throwing more money, programs and administration at this bottomless pit, and discover what motivates a Miss Johnson or simply how to hire more just like her.
This artifact
took place over twenty years ago, and the challenges today are even greater. In these cyberspace times with internet, I-pads,
cell phones, and facebook, without question a new cyber hegemony has been
created. We need more than just teachers
today; we must find passionate motivational educational entertainers. The future will require “Edutainers” for
teachers if we are to break through and illuminate students.
Words to the script for this segment of the movie:
Color Codes for Script:
Words of the poem
Miss Johnson (Michelle Phiffer) speaking
Students speaking
Illumination
......................................................................................................................................................................
"I
will not go down underground because somebody tells me that death's comin round"Okay, this is another Dylan poem.
Now, is that a code, or does that just mean what it says?
"And I will not carry myself down to die
When I go to my grave my head will be high"

What does that mean?
Anybody
Nobody
Is there something I should know?
Yeah. I'll
tell you.
You ratted
on Raul, Gusmaro and Emilio.Yeah. You got Emilio put into detention.

And you got Rauland, Gusmaro suspended.
Now they're gonna get their fuckin' asses kicked.
And you got Emilio
Hey, I
didn't rat on anybody.
Wasn't
none of your business anyway, you chismosa.
Bullshit. Let this..
Told you she was full of shit.
Snitches get stitches, bitch.
Do you
wanna talk about this?
We don't have no choices in this room.
Well, if
you all feel that strongly about it, leave the room.
What?

Nobody's forcing you to be here.
You have a choice.
You can stay, or you can leave.
Lady, why
are you playin' this game?
We don't
have a choice.You don't have a choice?
You don't have a choice on whether or not you're here?
No. lf we
leave, we don't get to graduate.
If we
stay, we gotta put up with you.
Well,
that's a choice, isn't it?
You have a
choice.You either don't graduate or you have to put up with me.
It may not be a choice you like, but it is a choice.
Man, you
don't understand nothing.
I mean,
you don't come from where we live.You-You're not bussed here.
Man, you
come and live in my neighborhood for one week and then you tell me if you got a
choice.
There are
a lot of people who live in your neighborhood who choose not to get on that
bus.
What do
they choose to do?They choose to go out and sell drugs.
They choose to go out and kill people.
They choose to do a lot of other things.
But they choose not to get on that bus.
The people who choose to get on that bus, which are you, are the people who are saying, "I will not carry myself down to die… When I go to my grave… My head will be high"
That is a choice.
There are no victims in this class room!
Why do you
care anyway?
You just
here for the money.
Because I
make a choice to care.
And,
honey, the money ain't that good.
Whatever.
Read it
again, Miss Johnson.
What?
Read those
lines you just read again.

Because you wouldn't go under the ground if someone told you death was comin'.
But you would go into the ground if you were already dead.
Do the
rest of you agree with that?
Well, I
kinda agree with it, but I think it just means that he ain't gonna help death
out, you know?
It's not
like he's just gonna lay down and wait for it.I think he's gonna choose- No, I think he's gonna make the choice to die hard.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah, I
agree with that.Yeah, me too.

Okay.
Well, what
about, uh, the rest of it? Um "When I go to my grave… My head will be high"
"Head will be high." What does that mean?
You're
gonna die with pride.
Right?http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/d/dangerous-minds-script-transcript-pfeiffer.html
No comments:
Post a Comment